Build on science that holds up.
Every decision — to fund, publish, license, or invest — rests on research you can’t re-verify yourself. In the AI era, that means building on slop. Αlpha¹ validates the rigor of the science your organization relies on, inside your walls and out.
Three ways to put rigor to work.
One engine, wherever a decision depends on the science holding up — your knowledge, your submissions, or someone else’s work.
Validate what you build on
The papers, reports, and datasets your teams rely on — checked for rigor before they shape a decision. Keep the knowledge you build on grounded in evidence that holds up, not AI-generated or low-rigor slop.
Clear the bar the first time
Run a rigor check on your own manuscripts and reports before they reach formal review. Catch the methods, statistics, and citation gaps that get work sent back — while you can still fix them.
Diligence before you commit
Evaluate the rigor of the science behind a company, a license, or a grant before you invest. Rigor verdicts and integrity exposure across an evidence chain — in hours, not a consulting engagement.
Built for the people who act on research.
From a single manuscript to a whole portfolio — the same rigor, tuned to the decision in front of you.
Funders
Portfolio assurance, earlier
Spot methods, stats, citation, and integrity risk on funded papers as soon as they post — not months later at journal review.
Research institutions
Integrity at lab scale
Give every lab a structured rigor check before submission, and integrity offices an evidence-anchored record instead of ad-hoc screening.
Pharma R&D & BD
De-risk what you build on
Gauge reproducibility risk on target and mechanism papers, and diligence in-licensing candidates. Reviewed privately — never sent to a public model.
Publishers & societies
Screening that conserves reviewers
Stats, citation, and data/code checks at desk-review speed, so scarce reviewer time goes to the papers that clear the bar.
Investors
Diligence at deal speed
Rigor verdicts and integrity exposure across the papers a company is built on — in hours, not a consulting engagement.
Your organization
Something else in mind?
Portfolio views, screening, and API access roll out through pilots with named partners.
Auditable, not just reviewed.
Every verdict traces to the passage, table, or figure behind it — built to survive expert scrutiny, and to be cited.
Findings, not vibes
Eight dimensions, from study design to data and code — each finding tied to the exact passage, table, or figure.
Provenance, shown
Every review shows what was checked, what wasn’t, and which engine version ran — so any verdict can be traced to its evidence, audited, and re-run.
Kept up to date
Retractions, corrections, and PubPeer threads keep updating the verdict after publication.
Start now. Scale through a pilot.
See it in action
Every published record is a real review — public and citable. Browse the showcase to gauge the depth and format before you commit.
Commission review
Request a rigor review on the work you’re evaluating — or your own — and escalate to Formal Expert Review when you need named experts: a report in 21 days.
Pilot the infrastructure
Validation at scale — internal knowledge monitoring, submission screening, and API access — is scoped with pilot partners first, so what we ship fits how you actually decide.